Atheist fundamentalist and evolution crackpot Richard Dawkins has finally broken the silence as to why he refuses to debate Professor William Lane Craig. Dawkins claims that it is due to Lane Craigs biblical beliefs!
As Lane Craig is a theologian this should hardly come as a surprise.
Dawkins then proudly trumpets other theologians he has debated. These previous opponents, including archbishops, presumably also believe in the Bible - anyone spot an inconsistency in his 'explanation' yet?!
Apparently, Dawkins own ignorance of Biblical knowledge and understanding of Deuteronomy is the reason why he refuses to debate Lane Craig. What a shame. It is this kind of confusion which could be cleared up by such a debate.
Dawkins then goes on to boast of what an unknown Lane Craig is. Yet it is the very public embarrassment of Dawkins cowardice which has prompted this pitiful response from Dawkins in the first place.
Surely the best way for Dawkins to keep what little respect he has left amongst his disciples, is to simply beat Lane Craig in a debate?
Meanwhile, Dawkins is hard at work on his second children's book 'The Princess and the Ape - the story of a rather inconvenient random mutation'
