Daily Mail readers up in arms over skydiving babies

Written by IainB

Friday, 16 March 2012

image for Daily Mail readers up in arms over skydiving babies
This baby took so long to reach the ground, he was thirty-five when he landed.

Daily Mail readers have been left looking red faced after the Daily Mail picked up a story about babies as young as three months old skydiving that was apparently untrue.

"There was a satirical story about this," said the editor of the Daily Mail, Rebekha Mills. "Unfortunately, we thought it was true and wrote a story blasting those responsible."

This was put onto the Daily Mail website where hundreds of readers joined in the horror of small babies being thrown out of planes, with comments like "it shouldn't be allowed" and "I blame illegal immigrants" rife.

"In hindsight," said Mills, "We should have realised that the story was untrue when the article mentioned that one couple were planning on giving birth whilst free-falling. As labour can take several hours, and skydivers are in the air for only a few minutes, this is physically, biologically and possibly chemically, impossible."

With no pictures of skydiving babies available, the Daily Mail had mocked up an image of a baby in free fall reminiscent of the iconic Nirvana album cover. Their Photoshop job was so good that it convinced Daily Mail readers to the veracity of the story.

"We have issued a retraction," admitted Mills. "We've apologised for getting the wrong end of the stick in a thirty word piece on page thirty-nine of yesterday's paper. Between the article about hamsters being used for clearing mine-fields and the advert for erectile dysfunction."

The story above is a satire or parody. It is entirely fictitious.

Do you dream of being a comedy news writer? Click here to be a writer!

Spoof news topics

Mailing List

Get Spoof News in your email inbox!

Go to top
readers are online right now!
Globey, The Spoof's mascot

We use cookies to give you the best experience, this includes cookies from third party websites and advertisers.

Continue ? Find out more