Forum Home / Login / Register

This forum does not allow guest posting. You must register to participate in this forum.

Messages ordered by earliest posts first
All times are GMT

Forum Home / General Discussion / What is freedom of speech?


[This topic is LOCKED]

AuthorMessage
Thakela
Writer


Location: India
Registered: 29 Dec 07

Forum Profile
Writer's Profile
Posted: 7 Jan 08 14:30
Hi,

I posted the following in an article :

-------

After watching the test match, someone has written some rules have to be incorporated by ICC to give the other teams a perfect clarification

(1) Ricky Ponting - (THE TRULY GENUINE CRICKETER OF THE CRICKET ERA AND WHOSE INTEGRITY SHOULD NOT BE DOUBTED) should be considered as the FOURTH UMPIRE. As per the new rules, FOURTH UMPIRE decision is final and will over ride any decisions taken by any other umpires. ON-FIELD umpires can seek the assistance of RICKY PONTING even if he is not on the field. This rule is to be made, so that every team should understand the importance of the FOURTH UMPIRE.

(2) While AUSTRALIAN TEAM is bowling, If the ball flies anywhere close to the AUSTRALIAN FIELDER(WITHIN 5 metre distance), the batsman is to be considered OUT irrelevant of whether the catch was taken cleanly or grassed. Any decision for further clarification should be seeked from the FOURTH UMPIRE. This is made to ensure that the cricket is played with SPORTIVE SPIRIT by all the teams.

(3) While BATTING, AUSTRALIAN players will wait for the ON-FIELD UMPIRE decisions only (even if the catch goes to the FIFTH SLIP as the ball might not have touched the bat). Each AUSTRALIAN batsman has to be out FOUR TIMES (minimum) before he can return to the pavilion. In case of THE CRICKETER WITH INTEGRITY, this can be higher.

(4) UMPIRES should consider a huge bonus if an AUSTRALIAN player scores a century. Any wrong decisions can be ignored as they will be paid huge bonus and will receive the backing of the AUSTRALIAN team and board.

(5) All AUSTRALIAN players are eligible to keep commenting about all players on the field and the OPPONENT TEAM should never comment as they will be spoiling the spirit of the AUSTRALIAN team. Any comments made in any other language are to be considered as RACISM only.

(6) MATCH REFREE decisions will be taken purely on the AUSTRALIAN TEAM advice only. Player views from the other teams decisions will not be considered for hearing. MATCH REFREES are to be given huge bonus if this rule is implemented.

(7) NO VISITING TEAM should plan to win in AUSTRALIA. This is to ensure that the sportive spirit of CRICKET is maintained.

(8) THE MOST IMPORTANT RULE: If any bowler gets RICKY PONTING - "THE UNDISPUTED CRICKETER WITH INTEGTIRY IN THE GAME OF CRICKET" more than twice in a series, he will be banned for the REST OF THE SERIES. This is to ensure that the best batsman/Captain will be played to break records and create history in the game of CRICKET.

These rules will clarify better to the all the teams VISITING AUSTRALIA.

Courtesy: Email Forwarding Times

---------------------

Now I believe this is a satire on the current functioning of ICC - International Cricket council.

However this article was not approved. Can any one let me know the reason for this?

Thakela

Jesus Budda
Two sheets to the wind
Posted: 7 Jan 08 18:28
Crickets ****. Thats yer problem.

Jesus Budda

Fergus McCarthy
Devil's Avocado
Fergus McCarthy

Location: Hibernia.
Registered: 17 Jan 07

Forum Profile
Writer's Profile
Posted: 7 Jan 08 18:43
I think I've read that article before, about 18 months ago in Australia.
It seems familiar.

If it's original, well done but if it's a rip............


Fergus McCarthy

Thakela
Writer


Location: India
Registered: 29 Dec 07

Forum Profile
Writer's Profile
Posted: 8 Jan 08 20:02
It is not original!

I just wanted to know if that was removed because of its lack of originality of because of some other reason!

Mark
Little Red Hen
Mark

Location: Lancaster, England
Registered: 8 Apr 03

Forum Profile
Writer's Profile
Posted: 8 Jan 08 21:53
Yes, the article was deleted because its status is unknown and presumed to be under copyright.

This thread will self destruct at some point, I'm sure.

Ta.


 
Any opinions expressed here are purely the opinions of the contributors and are not necessarily the opinions of The Spoof, its staff or the original writer of the spoof news/parody/satire story.

Go to top

Forum permissions

You are not logged in.

  • You cannot create new topics in this forum
  • You cannot post new messages in this forum
  • You cannot add polls
  • You cannot link to external images in this forum
  • You cannot upload images in this forum
  • You cannot upload files in this forum
Who is online?

There are no registered users currently online.

Go to top
readers are online right now!
Globey, The Spoof's mascot