Discussion Forum

Am I the only one 'playing' in this forum?

Looks like it.

What are you 'the only one' at doing.

Please, you guys...don't state the bleeding obvious.....be creative to some degree. Ta though!


LG

I'm the only one who is responding to this thread...

Iain

I am the only one who is me replying to this thread.

Am I the only one daft enougt to even think of starting such a stoopid thread?

Lady G

I'm the only guy who never shuts up about Wales.

Isnit.

Am I the only one who isn't bovvered?

LG

Am I the only one who isn't going to reply to this thread.............?

Am I

Am I the only one - besides Monkey - who has realized that you have to start with Am I the only one...?

Lady Godiva

Am I the only one who assumes by Monkey, LG, you mean Birbee?

Am I the only one who knows how to make an anagram of "Am I the omly one?

Am I the only one who thinks that some people on here start threads about nothing, just to feed their extremely hungry egos?

Am I the only one that thinks the starter of this thread falls into that category?

Am I the only one who thinks that category could be called People Who Will Do Anything To Get Noticed?

Am I the only one who thinks that the category could also be called People Who Think That Anything Is Better Than Being Ignored?

Am I the only one who is going to get slated for making these observations?

Am I the only one who doesn't care what you think..you are HERE aren't you?

Am I the only one who mixes up Monkey and Birbee because of Birbee's Avatar.

Am I the only one apologing to Birbee - Sorry Birbee

Am I the only one who thinks the titles of theads above are good and you can go ahead and start them if you wish?

Lady G.

---

Quote: Lady Godiva

Am I the only one apologing to Birbee

---

...apologing? What's that?

Don't you use question marks?

---

Quote: Lady Godiva

Am I the only one who thinks the titles of theads above are good and you can go ahead and start them if you wish?

---

... theads ...

They aren't suggested thread titles; they are categories which you, as starter of the thread, fall into.

I am the only one who doesn't start with 'Am I the only one'.

[nods emphatically]

Iain

Am I the only one who makes 'typos'??????????????????????????...I think not.
Am I the only one fixing my typo??????????????? YES I meant 'apologizing'.

Am I the only one missing out questions marks because question marks are 'understood' at the end of questions so you should know to put one there yourself.

Am I the only one thinking you are nit-picking ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Am I the only one who as given you a lot of question marks so you can stick them where you wish ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????


Lady Godiva

Am I the only one who, without wishing to be a nit-picker, is moved to point to the Act of Public Impropriety, 1856, and to refer to its famous test case, viz. The Bishop of Rottingdean v Regina, 1867, Lord Justice Nimbus presiding, the judgement of the court being:

...heretofore and hereinunder defined in terms of replavin and replevin, with or without a stay of inflamed or subluminary droming, within the meaning of the Act, subject to the parameters of a judgement arrived at, to, or on, the basis of blind plenary suffrage, whether it be said to be, or to be said, to be said, or to be said or to be said to be gainsaid, without recourse to a framework of joundary or brocage...it being proven, albus sphincter prolapsum that the playing of a bugle, to mark the procession of a party of Royal Sycophants through a village might be, in toto or in tuto viewed as an assault, within the purview especial of a reading in the spirit of the Act. Whereas, whereat and whereinunder it has been the habitual recourse of the Court of Special Tomfoolery to issue a judgement of vapiage in a similar case cf. Mrs Ophelia Spither v Juxtable's Compressed Pianofortes, 1861, the present case, being viewed, within the aforementioned purview especial, might be termed, quo qua quo qum quo quoo, with external vapimenta, a special case of..."

But you get my drift, I am sure, without further explanation, or indeed illustration.

---

Quote: Mister Meaner

Am I the only one who thinks that some people on here start threads about nothing, just to feed their extremely hungry egos?

Am I the only one that thinks the starter of this thread falls into that category?

Am I the only one who thinks that category could be called People Who Will Do Anything To Get Noticed?

Am I the only one who thinks that the category could also be called People Who Think That Anything Is Better Than Being Ignored?

Am I the only one who is going to get slated for making these observations?

---

Am I the only one who subscribes to live and let live?

Am I the only one who won't be congratulating Mister Meaner on being FW?

Am I the only one who changes her mind and so CONGRATULATIONS ON BEING FW Mister. Nice photo!)

Lady G

(PS...is he SERIOUS...ME WANTING TO BE NOTICED ? Maybe he'll calm down now that he's been recognized as FW )

I was never anything but calm, Lady Godiva.


By the way, drat and double drat that I am the Featured Wanker. I don't deserve it, whatever 'it' is, I'm not keeping up any kind of work - good or bad - and I don't consider myslef a 'Class Act', except between the hours of 8.30 to 15.30, Monday to Friday.

The picture was taken when I was 10.

Am I? Probably

The. 'The' what?

Only one. Ok. But only if you say 'please'.




Am I the only one who talks to themselves? Judging by today's lack of 'hits' - yes.

Am I the only one who's seen the updated photo of Mister Meaner with tatooed forehead?

Lady G.

LG, you're the only one who can YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY?

Am I the only one who understands that last post????




LG