President Obama's mention of empathy as a possible desirable quality in a Supreme court Justice has set off a fit of blind rage among his republican opponents. Senators, representatives and Republican dog catchers have been foaming at the mouth and pitching satanic-sized hissy fits over the Democrat presidents preference for a judge who might be able to suffer with someone else.
Arizona senator, Ives Gotpiles attempted to get the elected representatives who will vote on an Obama nominee to imagine what an empathetic Supreme might have voted like in some of America's crucial Supreme Court decisions:
"Empathy would have suggested all kinds of different fractions in the 3/5ths compromise, we'd still be bickering over 1/2, 3/4ths or what about counting a slave as a full person! Brown VS the Board of Ed would have never been resolved with all the hair-splitting empathy would have brought to the table- brown, what about tan, or burnt siena, let's look at all the browns in the crayola giant box!
"Roe VS Wade would still be trying to decided how to cross the controversial amniotic fluid stream. The empathetic Justice would probably have wanted to ask women what they think... as if they can."