Outspoken self opinionated atheist fundamentalist and evolution crackpot children's author Richard Dawkins, has yet again refused to debate.
His usual bully boy tactics of sparring against TV presenters, ordinary laypersons and hecklers at his own sermons would fall on deaf ears when confronted with a more worthy opponent.
Dawkins claims to be "too busy" to take on professional debaters and creationists. This will no doubt be a real disappointment to the gullible devoted fans of Dawkins who really believe that he has answers to the awkward questions posed by his detractors.
Another laughable excuse for Dawkins cowardice is that he doesn't want to further the careers of his opponents.
The latest challenger to Dawkins is William Lane Craig. He is the author and editor of over 30 books and is the current research professor of philosophy at the Talbot School of Theology in California. As you will realise, he does not need Dawkins to enhance his profile.
Surely if Dawkins was to defeat such a high profile and worthy opponent, it would improve the sales of his books as well as his credibility. As things stand he is looking increasingly ridiculous as he runs away from one opponent after another. Perhaps he knows that his arguments don't hold water?