Written by defamationstation

Print this
Tags: Kevorkian

Saturday, 4 June 2011

image for Response To Those Who Believe That Jack Kevorkian was An Angel Of Mercy. Typical Kevorkian Proponent.

With respect to those that believe that Jack Kevorkian was a benevolent Angel of Mercy: You're a f--king uninformed idiot.

Are you aware that at least 60 percent of Kevorkian's suicide patients were not terminal? Do you know that at least 17 could have lived indefinitely? Are you aware that in THIRTEEN cases, Kevorkian killed people that had NO complaints of pain or quality of life issues?

Obviously not. Dolt.

Before rendering your opinion, did you know that in 1992, Kevorkian wrote it is always mandatory to bring in a psychiatrist because a person's "mental state is . . . of paramount importance," yet, in at least 19 cases, Kevorkian did not contact psychiatrists? Or that in at least five of these cases, the people who died had histories of depression?

Doubt it. Asshat.

Before you Canonize Kevorkian, read about Janet Adkins, a 54-year-old woman who was Kevorkian's first suicide. Three days earlier, the Alzheimer's disease patient had beaten her son at tennis. Read about how Kevorkian's opinion on her fitness to kill herself was based solely on conversations WITH HER HUSBAND.

You want your spouse to decide whether or not some doctor is going to kill you? I thought not. Dullard.

Read about Rebecca Badger, 39, who was a mentally troubled drug abuser and had NO physical disease. An autopsy showed she was mistakenly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis.

Informed > Opinionated.

(For those that think this means that the first big word is smiling at the second big word, it means 'Being informed is greater than being opinionated.')

The story above is a satire or parody. It is entirely fictitious.

If you fancy trying your hand at comedy spoof news writing, click here to join!

More by this writer

View Story
View Story
View Story
View Story
View Story
View Story

Stop - Warning

The story you are trying to access may cause offense, may be in poor taste, or may contain subject matter of a graphic nature.

This story was written as a satire or parody. It is entirely fictitious.

To confirm you have acknowledged this warning, and wish to continue to read the article, please click the following link.

Otherwise, please click here to go back to the home page.


39 readers are online right now!

Go to top

We use cookies to give you the best experience, this includes cookies from third party websites and advertisers.

Continue ? Find out more