Written by the_frog

Print this

Wednesday, 28 April 2010

It has been brought to my attention that a certain Western young woman of sadly limited intellectual abilities has endeavored to call into question the unquestionable revealed truth relating to the link between earthquakes and immodesty expressed in my recent article in the Chicago Tribune, and this by means of an ill-judged "experiment" involving the massive display of so-called "tits" at various locations across the globe.

I should like to point out that a more considered reading of my comments would have helped to avoid this flippant and demeaning gesture, and would like to thank all those Western women conscious of the need to defend their own dignity (a pious tribe known there as "feminists") who have appropriately leapt to my defense.

Firstly, having received an education by the fortunate fact of not being born in Indiana, I am aware that immodesty does not redefine tectonic boundaries. The earthquakes that occur do so at such boundaries. It is merely the frequency and intensity thereof which is a function of immodesty.

Secondly, the effects of immodesty are cumulative over time and Allah chooses the moment at which to punish it. There is no simple quantitive cause-and-effect relationship at any given moment in time.

So dimwits. Get a life.

The story above is a satire or parody. It is entirely fictitious.

If you fancy trying your hand at comedy spoof news writing, click here to join!


57 readers are online right now!

Go to top

We use cookies to give you the best experience, this includes cookies from third party websites and advertisers.

Continue ? Find out more