Written by Bureau
Rating:

Share/Bookmark
Print this

Wednesday, 4 November 2009

image for Robert Pattinson May Not Be Able To Reproduce

Actor Robert Pattinson may not be able to produce any progeny, unless he bites them on the throat of course, as a source states that he may have a low sperm count.

When interviewed by this reporter, an unnamed doctor's office help said that it was not impossible for Pattinson to have children, but that it would be more difficult.

"One guy has already had a baby, read it in the Post", laughed the source. "Seriously, things are a lot different than they were in the old days and anything can happen in medical science today."

"So he still could have a houseful of kids", I asked.

"Sure, a whole clan", she giggled.

When I asked the cause, the source stated that she had asked the doc and that he had told her that it ran in families.

"If a man can not have children, it's a good chance that his children won't be able to have children. hee hee"

When asked why all the jokes, she then stated that she had never seen Robert Pattinson in her life except in movie mags.

As she walked away laughing, I was totally confused. Finally I thought about the double negative thing and that if her story wasn't true but the article states that this is not true, then it must be true!

Poor old Robert Pattinson.

Make Bureau's day - give this story five thumbs-up (there's no need to register, the thumbs are just down there!)

The story above is a satire or parody. It is entirely fictitious.

If you fancy trying your hand at comedy spoof news writing, click here to join!

Print this


Share/Bookmark

Mailing List

Get Spoof News in your email inbox!

Email:

What's 4 multiplied by 3?

8 25 12 11

Go to top